When considering proposals for the writing of any type of Credit and Financial Guarantee risks Lloyd’s will expect that the managing agent can demonstrate that the following points are addressed:
Appropriate capability and resource
The writing of Credit and Financial Guarantee classes requires a high level of technical expertise in the underlying risks. Where it is proposed that a syndicate will write any of the Credit and Financial Guarantee products then Lloyd’s will expect the managing agent to be able to demonstrate that it has suitable underwriting resources in place. In particular, Lloyd’s will expect managing agents to have a suitably robust analytical resource to support the underwriting of any business. Managing agents should also have appropriate models in place, suitable to the types of risk being underwritten.
Assignment of policy
All Credit and Financial Guarantee policies (in whichever of the risk codes listed above) must contain a condition that only allows assignment of the policy with the prior written agreement of underwriters. Where assignment of a policy does take place, the obligations placed upon the original insured by the terms of the policy must be transferred so that they become obligations of the assignee.
It is acceptable to allow for the proceeds of a policy to be paid to a third party provided that the obligations on the insured under the terms of the policy remain with the insured.
Insolvency of the Insured
All policies must contain an exclusion in respect of any loss arising from the insolvency of the insured. In a number of territories or classes it is recognized that market practice may mean that a full exclusion is not achievable (examples of such classes include Japanese contingency, aviation contingency business, and (re)insurance of Export Credit Agencies). In such cases Lloyd’s, on a request received from the managing agent (either as part of the business plan agreement process or for individual risks outside the business plan), may agree with the managing agent the use of clauses that do not provide a full exclusion. Lloyd’s will also agree the scope of business that can be written on this basis.
Delegated underwriting
Other than where delegation is to a service company coverholder, Lloyd’s is unlikely to agree plans for the writing of Credit and Financial Guarantee business in any of the products listed where the risks are bound by way of delegated underwriting. This includes, in particular, binding authorities and line slips.
Accelerated payments
Where policies provide for the insured to be indemnified for the non-payment of a financial obligation by the obligor where the obligation in question involves the obligor making a payment at a future date or a number of payments over time (for example the re-payment of a loan in instalments) then it will be usual for the insurance backing the obligation to pay out over time in accordance with the original payment schedule. Lloyd’s may agree in appropriate cases to the inclusion of provisions for the making of accelerated payments at the sole election of the insured. As a general rule, however, underwriters should, in each case, have the opportunity to agree or decline to make the accelerated payments.
Fraud
Subject to any local legal or regulatory requirements, all policies must contain a clause, or clauses, to the effect that the insurer shall have at least the remedies available under the Insurance Act 2015 in relation to fraudulent misrepresentation and fraudulent claims.
In s8/Schedule 1, the Act sets out that if a qualifying breach of the duty of fair presentation was deliberate or reckless, the insurer (a) may avoid the contract and refuse all claims, and (b) need not return any of the premium paid.
In s12 the Act sets out that if the insured makes a fraudulent claim, the insurer (a) is not liable to pay the claim, (b) the insurer may recover from the insured any sums paid by the insurer to the insured in respect of the claim, and (c) in addition the insurer may by notice to the insured treat the contract as having been terminated with effect from the time of the fraudulent act.
Contracts of surety
Underwriters are reminded that, while underwriters at Lloyd’s can provide reinsurance to non-Lloyd’s firms in respect of business they undertake as licensed surety bond providers (Risk Code SB), Lloyd’s does not permit the direct writing of these contracts of surety. Additionally, licensing restrictions apply to this class in most jurisdictions.
Proposals that are unlikely to be agreed
In view of the nature of the risks involved, managing agents should note that Lloyd’s is unlikely to agree plans that involve the writing of the following types of risks:
- Where the underlying risk is a tradeable instrument or a contract for difference
- Where the primary risk is price risk rather than credit risk, for example:
- Currency fluctuation risk
- Commodity price fluctuation risk
- Any Agricultural revenue protection product (under risk code AG or HA), with the exception of U.S. Multi Peril Crop Insurance reinsurance that is subsidised by the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
- Financial market fluctuation risk
- Property/land price fluctuation risk
Performance Management – Supplemental Requirements and Guidance, pages 33-35